spacer
Home
21 October 2007  Home
Event 360: Specialists in Sports Entertainment, Ceremonies & Stadium Logistics
Tenders
bl_end spacer
Username
Password
Register now
Lost Password?
spacer
upcoming events title
Event
Date
Rugby World Cup 2007
07/09/2007
spacer
IAAF World Cup, Stuttgart
22/09/2007
spacer
Special Olympics World Summer Games, Shanghai 2007
02/10/2007
spacer
Asian Indoor Games 2007
26/10/2007
spacer
UEFA Euro 2008, Austria-Switzerland
07/06/2008
spacer
Summer Olympic Games, Beijing
08/08/2008
spacer
laft banner
spacer
 Sheffield United claim £30m from Hammers
 17/08/2007
sarch right angle
spacer
Sheffield United's bitter wrangle with West Ham United over the Carlos Tevez affair is destined for a third arbitration hearing after the Yorkshire club took legal action against the Londoners yesterday, seeking "substantial compensation" of up to £30m for being relegated.

West Ham avoided the drop last season largely thanks to the late-season heroics of Tevez. This was after a first arbitration hearing had already fined them £5.5m over irregularities in the signings of Tevez and Javier Mascherano. A second hearing, at Sheffield United's request, post-relegation, challenged the Premier League's enforcement of its own rules, but failed to change the verdict.

United have now changed tack, and are gunning directly at West Ham, accusing them of a "breach of utmost good faith". The mechanism they have chosen is to serve notice of arbitration to West Ham under the Football Association's Rule K.

United's basis for their latest claim is not just that West Ham acted dishonestly in obtaining the registration of Tevez by failing to reveal he was controlled by a third party. United will also cite as evidence for the first time a document dated 1 December 2006, which purports to show that West Ham's new regime, not just the old owners, had an illicit third-party deal.

United will argue that neither of the previous hearings saw this document, and so did not make a ruling based on the full facts when fining West Ham rather than docking points.

West Ham have 14 days to respond to United's action. One solution could be an out-of-court settlement, with West Ham paying Sheffield United compensation, probably of a few million pounds or less. With no such settlement, a hearing would go ahead, with each side nominating one of three panellists, and the third picked by mutual agreement.

The panel will rehear all evidence and have the powers to award unlimited compensation, if United win. The panel's findings would be binding, if it came to that.

(Source: Independent.co.uk)
Back
GamesBids: An Authoritative Review of Olympic Bid Business
spacer
Sports Business ISEMS 2007: The Event the Industry Demanded
spacer
Legacy Lives: The International Legacy Conference
spacer
Digital Sport 08: Digital Sport Event
spacer
PanStadia: Journal for the developing sports facility industry
spacer
USA Racquetball: Sponsorhip opportunities with USA Racquetball Events
spacer
bottom left
 Home  spacer  Organising Committees and Sports Bodies   spacer  Sports Industry Providers & Suppliers Directory   spacer  Sports Jobs  spacer  Recruiters 
bottom right
 Tenders  spacer  Sports News  spacer  Raising Volunteers  spacer  Links  spacer  Advertise With Us  spacer  About Us  spacer  Contact Us  spacer   
spacer All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners.
All the rest copyright © 2007 Sports City. All rights reserved.
spacer