IRB discusses ‘Tier 2’ calendar 16/03/2010
|
|
| |
| |
The International Rugby Board (IRB) has met with representatives from the ‘Tier 2’ Unions to discuss scheduling more fixtures for the sport’s up-and-coming sides.
Representatives from Canada, Fiji, Georgia, Japan, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Samoa, Tonga and USA were invited to participate in the meeting in Los Angeles to talk about ways to further bridge the gap to Tier 1 status.
IRB chief executive Mike Miller: "The historic first meeting between the Unions was both constructive and extremely positive. A range of headline issues were discussed and each Union contributed fully to a process that will further strengthen the close collaborative relationship between the IRB and Tier 2 Unions.
"The IRB is committed to increasing global competitiveness and the performance of Tier 2 teams at Rugby World Cup 2007 highlights the incredible progress that has been made since the launch of the global strategic investment programme in 2005.
"The Unions fully endorsed the programme and the suite of IRB strategic tournaments as providing an essential platform for the continued growth and competitiveness of rugby across Tier 2 nations."
Additional fixtures for Tier 2 Unions during the November window were added last year.
Millar added: "There was consensus that the expanded November calendar has proven to be extremely successful for Tier 2 Unions in meeting strategic high performance objectives.
"However, in order to meet long-term development goals, the group identified a clear need for an integrated schedule that combines IRB strategic tournaments within a framework that also delivers regular matches against Tier 2 opposition within the June and November windows, including matches against Tier 1 opposition within the Rugby World Cup cycle.
"The issue of an integrated playing calendar is a complex one as it includes the requirements of clubs, provinces and national Unions, player welfare and geographical time zone considerations, but all parties are committed to the development of a schedule that recognises the collective needs of the Unions, delivering a structured framework that stimulates further growth over the next decade."
|
| Back |
| |
| |
|
|
 |
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|