spacer
23 December 2010  
spacer
Sports Business Portal - Home
HOME|NEWS|REPORTS|DIRECTORY|SPORTS JOBS|TENDERS|CONFERENCES|SPECIAL CHRISTMAS OFFERS spacer
SPORTS BUSINESS | SPONSORSHIP | TV RIGHTS | VENUES | SPORTS TECHNOLOGY | ECONOMICS | SPORTS MARKETING | BIDDING | SPORTS EVENTS | NEWSLETTER >> spacer

Username
Password 
Register now
Lost Password?

spacer

News Menu

»All News
»News by Sport
»Agencies - Companies
»Bidding
»Media Rights
  »TV Rights
  »Mobile Rights
  »Internet Rights
»Sports Legacy
»Sports Economics
»Governing Bodies
»Sports Hospitality
»Anti-Doping
»Sports Recruitment
»Sports Security
»Sports Sponsorship
»Sports Betting
»Sports Business
»Sports Events
»Sports Law
»Sports Marketing
»Sports Venues
»Sports Technology
»Ticketing
»News by Location
spacer
spacer
spacer

News by Events

»Olympics
»Summer Olympic Games
  »London 2012
  »Rio 2016
  »2020 Olympics
»Winter Olympic Games
  »Vancouver 2010
  »Sochi 2014
  »2018 Winter Olympics
»FIFA World Cup
  »South Africa 2010
  »Brazil 2014
  »2018 FIFA World Cup
»EURO
  »EURO 2012
  »EURO 2016
»Rugby World Cup
  »New Zealand 2011
  »2015 Rugby World Cup
  »2019 Rugby World Cup
»Commonwealth Games
  »Delhi 2010
  »Glasgow 2014
»Asian Games
  »Guangzhou 2010
  »Incheon 2014
»Cricket World Cup
  »2011 Cricket World Cup
»Pan American Games
»Africa Cup of Nations
»America's Cup
»FIBA World C'ship
»All Sports Events
spacer
spacer
Don King fails in defamation appeal 
 08/07/2010
 
 
A Florida appeals court has upheld a lower court's ruling that ESPN did not defame Don King in a programme on the boxing promoter.

The episode of ‘Sports Century’ included allegations that King cheated a hospital out of money from a benefit fight, owed money to boxer Meldrick Taylor and threatened to have him killed, and convinced doctors to invest in a film on King's life that was never made.

King sued ESPN, ABC and Disney for defamation, but the case was dismissed with a finding that he could not show "actual malice" from the defendants.

King argued on appeal that several email exchanges between ESPN producers showed the network harboured ill will towards him and wanted to portray him as a "huckster", a "thug" and an "evil mob-connected guy”.

In its latest decision, the Florida appeals court said there was a difference between "ill will" and "actual malice". The latter is required by law from public figures who assert libel claims and is generally meant to mean that plaintiffs need to show knowledge of false information published with reckless disregard for the truth.

"Nothing in the record shows that ESPN purposefully made false statements about King in order to bolster the theme of the programme or to inflict harm on King," wrote Judge Dorian Damoorgian in his decision.
Back
 
 

Advertisement

spacer

Popular Sections

»Sports Events
»Sports Business
»Sports Sponsorship
»Sports Marketing
»Sports Economics
»Media Rights
  »TV Rights
  »Mobile Rights
  »Internet Rights
»Sports Venues
»Bidding
»Sports Technology
»Sports Hospitality
»Sports Legacy
»Sports Security
»Sports Agencies
»Sports Law
»Sports Recruitment
»Ticketing
»Governing Bodies
»Football Business
»Rugby Business
»Cricket Business
»Motorsport Business
  »F1 Business
  »Motorcycling
  »Nascar industry
»Golf Business
»Tennis Business
»Sports Betting Industry
»Horse Racing Industry
»All News
Media Partners

 Home   |  Site Map  |  Sports Industry Providers & Suppliers   |  Sports Jobs  |  Links  |  Sports Industry Newsletter  |  Sports Industry Conferences 
 Sports Industry Tenders  |  Sports Industry News  |  Advertise With Us  |  About Us  |  Contact    
spacer © 2010 Sports City. All rights reserved. spacer